Oncast News · Morning Briefing

Deportations Up Despite Viral Claim

· Fact-checked before it aired. Unconfirmed claims from this segment are not shown.

In the 2026 Senate elections, Maine Republican Susan Collins lost her seat, leaving no Republican senators anywhere in New England — Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island and Connecticut — for the first time since the Civil War.

New England has trended heavily toward Democrats and independents; Collins was the last remaining Republican senator in the region and faced a competitive race in a state that has moved away from the GOP.

Senator-elect Abdul El-Sayed publicly said he does not back Chuck Schumer for Senate Democratic leader, calling for new leadership focused on money in politics, economic policy and Medicare for All.

After the 2026 elections, Maine Senator Susan Collins, the last Republican senator in New England, lost her seat, leaving the region with no Republican senators for the first time since the Civil War. Personal anecdote; “took back Texas” is too vague to be a checkable factual claim.

Fact-check

VERIFIED TRUE

Senator-elect Abdul El-Sayed publicly said he does not back Chuck Schumer for Senate Democratic leader, calling for new leadership focused on money in politics, economic policy and Medicare for All.

Senator-Elect @abdulelsayed.bsky.social does not back @schumer.senate.gov for leadership: "I want new leadership - focused on getting money out of politics, putting money in your pocket, and passing Medicare for all... I want to see who else is willing to throw their hat in the r

Original post · The Tennessee Holler (@thetnholler.bsky.social)

The Tennessee Holler NAMES: Abdul El-Sayed = incoming U.S. senator from Michigan; Chuck Schumer = Senate Democratic leader

VERIFIED TRUE

After the 2026 elections, Maine Senator Susan Collins, the last Republican senator in New England, lost her seat, leaving the region with no Republican senators for the first time since the Civil War. Personal anecdote; “took back Texas” is too vague to be a checkable factual claim.

For the first time since the Civil War, New England will have no Republican senators next year. www.ctinsider.com/politics/art...

Original post · Philip Bump (@pbump.com)

ctinsider.com POST bsky:at://did:plc:eox6lb53lka7lautxxbpobae/app.bsky.feed.post/3mzl5ixrc2c2i: NOCLAIM none

Sources

What the hosts said

BA post on X claims there have been "No Mass Deportations." Federal data says the opposite.
BRene Reyna posted that on X. NPR reports deportations have clearly increased and are running well above recent years.
BNot as high as the administration claims, but up. A false headline is still false.
BI get the frustration, though. People hear promises to secure the border and still see chaos.
BBut saying no mass deportations isn't opinion. It's wrong.
BIt's wrong on the number, I'll give you that. But the scale is the real story. A modest increase isn't the sweeping operation voters were promised.
BSo we should call it zero? That makes no sense.
BI'm not saying zero. I'm saying the post is sloppy, but the anger is real.
BThen argue for more enforcement, don't invent a false fact.
BHere's where I'll fight you: whatever the number, it's nowhere near "mass." Words matter.
BDeportations are well above recent years. By any sane measure, that's a mass operation.
BBy whose measure? The one that counts is the border communities still overwhelmed.
BThe data doesn't say the border is fine. It says deportations are up. Both things can be true.
BThen why does the administration keep claiming numbers that even NPR says aren't accurate?
BThat's a separate problem—the DHS oversells. But that doesn't make "no mass deportations" true.
BFine. The post is wrong on the headline. But the bigger failure is the federal government not convincing people it's on the job.
BThen we report both: deportations are up, and trust is down.
BThat's fair. I'd take the anger seriously, but I'd also like a policy that matches the promise.
BNow we're talking about policy, not slogans.
BMore interior enforcement, going after employers who hire illegal labor. That's how you change the math.
BThat's a real argument. And the numbers will tell us if it happens.
BBut it hasn't happened at scale, and people notice.
BThen the administration should say that, not inflate the numbers.
BWe agree on that. The spin makes it harder to trust the real progress.
BSo we report the spin and the real progress.
BDeal.
BSame theme, different post.
BGary Oak on X wrote that Republicans had the House, Senate, White House, and Supreme Court, and in his words, "didn't make a single meaningful change."
BThat's a popular take. "Meaningful" is doing a lot of work.
BBut if your wages didn't move and your rent didn't drop, what changed?
BPolicy changed. Whether it helped you is a different question.
BPeople aren't living in policy papers, Bella. They're living in their bank accounts.
BI understand the anger. But saying one side did nothing while controlling everything is false.
BMaybe not nothing, but nothing that mattered to the people who elected them.
BThat's the argument worth having—what mattered. Instead the post just ends with an expletive.
BIt's not exactly Lincoln-Douglas.
BIt's a sentiment a lot of people feel, though.
BExactly. Both parties have had their shot, and trust keeps falling. That's the real story.
BThat anger doesn't come from nowhere. People feel ignored.
BBecause they are. Washington argues about everything and fixes very little.
BAnd both parties love that game.
BUntil voters get loud enough to break it.
BThen the next election is a pressure release.
BOr more of the same.
BWe'll see. The anger isn't going anywhere.

Cite this story as https://oncast.fm/story/1793969106684-news-segment-deportations-up-despite-viral-claim. Fact-check by Oncast. Cite the original sources above too.

Listen live on Oncast