On Nov. 5, 2026, U.S. equities sold off sharply: the S&P 500 fell about 3.2% to roughly 7,445, and the Nasdaq dropped about 4.3% to roughly 24,627. The CBOE Volatility Index, or VIX, surged more than 70% on the day, its biggest daily gain since February 2018. President Trump released a statement calling it one of the market's worst days in history and tied the fall to the midterm election results.
The selloff followed Democrats' midterm victories, but market commentary suggested the election alone did not fully explain the drop. The Kobeissi Letter argued the move was “more technical than fundamental,” driven by a sudden sentiment shift colliding with heavy leverage and forced liquidations by major institutional investors. Fresh Democratic calls to restrict advanced AI development — including talk of a “ban on artificial superintelligence” — added to tech-stock anxiety, though Kobeissi called an outright ban unlikely because it would effectively mean the U.S. surrendering its AI race po
On Nov. 5, 2026, President Trump did issue a statement calling the day's stock-market selloff one of the market's worst days in history, according to multiple reports.
Trump said the market had “one of the worst days in history” and tied it to the midterm election results, while saying people should not fear and promising America would be “bigger and stronger than ever before.”
Trump reportedly called it “one of the worst days in history,” not the single worst day in history. The post drops the qualifier “one of.” This is a forward-looking market comment/prediction about KOSPI, not a checkable factual claim.
Trump did say the market suffered “one of the Worst Days in History” following Democrats' midterm victories, according to reports. The post is a sarcastic/opaque reaction to a quoted post about Korean stock buyers; it makes no clear factual claim that can be checked.
APresident Trump put out a statement calling the election-night selloff one of the worst days in history.
BOne of the worst days. That qualifier is doing real work.
AThe S&P fell about three percent, the Nasdaq more than four. The VIX jumped over seventy percent.
BSo not the worst. Just one of them. Fine.
ASome accounts on X are already dropping the qualifier. Unusual Whales wrote 'the worst day in history.'
BThat's not what he said. The actual words are 'one of the worst days.'
AWatcher Guru on X posted the full line—'one of the worst days in history'—and he tied it to the midterms.
BHe also said do not fear, and promised bigger and stronger than ever.
AThat's a political line, not a market analysis.
BBut the market fell after Democrats won. It's not crazy to connect them.
AIt's too simple. The Kobeissi Letter on X called it more technical than fundamental.
BTechnical how? Elections change expectations for AI regulation and taxes.
ALeverage. Forced liquidations. A sentiment shock meeting overleveraged institutional positions.
BSo the election was the spark, not the fire. That's exactly my point.
AAnd the fire might still be burning. Volatility like that doesn't turn off overnight.
BIt can. The VIX spiked more than seventy percent, but that's what a leverage unwind looks like.
AThe VIX jumped sharply, one of the bigger moves we've seen. That's historic.
BAnd 2018 wasn't the end of the world. Corrections happen.
ABut this one has an AI angle. Democrats won, and immediately there's talk of restricting advanced AI.
BOh, come on. Nobody is banning superintelligence. That would hand China the race.
AKobeissi says an outright ban is unlikely for exactly that reason. But the chatter hits big tech.
BSo traders priced in a scenario the same analysts call unlikely? Sounds technical, not fundamental.
ANo, no wait—that's exactly my point. The chatter is real even if the ban isn't.
BThen it's sentiment affecting leverage. Not a fundamental collapse.
AWe don't need a fundamental collapse for a bad day. We got a bad day.
BFine. Bad day, yes. But calling it one of the worst in history because of an election needs more.
AHe didn't say because of the election alone. He said based on the election results.
BStill, global markets were already fragile. Korea's Kospi looked shaky before the votes were counted.
ANow you're adding global fragility. Good, that's my side.
BI'm not on a side. I'm saying markets don't move on one variable.
AKobeissi also says zoom out and remain calm. They call it a correction in an overleveraged environment.
BZoom out? Easy to say when your thesis isn't getting liquidated.
AThey add that midterm years have historically been strong buying opportunities. That's their view, not mine.
BHistory is a guide, not a promise. And it doesn't make the VIX any less jarring.
ABut a three percent down day can look like noise from far away.
BTell that to the forced liquidations. That's not noise to the people getting margin-called.
AThat's why leverage is dangerous. Kobeissi says institutional investors were forced to sell.
BForced selling creates prices that don't reflect value. That's the real story.
AThen we agree the drop was mostly technical?
BI'd say mostly technical, with a political headline. Don't put me in the Trump camp.
ATrump's camp includes 'do not fear' and bigger and stronger. That's not an analysis.
BNo, but it's better than silence. After a VIX spike, people want a voice.
AMaybe. But I'd rather hear what the Fed does next than a campaign promise.
BNow we're talking. Rates and bonds were already jittery before the election.
ASpeaking of global fragility, Zerohedge on X had a brutal line about Korea.
BThey wrote the Kospi may want to skip its next session. Might be halted at the open.
AThat's a prediction, but the pain in leveraged Korea ETFs is real.
BThey said KORU was down forty percent during the selloff and down ninety percent from June highs.
AA triple leveraged ETF falling that far. That's how momentum chasers end.
BLeverage is a tool. It also cuts both ways.
AAnd it's a reminder that these one-way trades can stop being one-way in a single session.
BThat's why risk management gets tested in moves like this.
ANo argument. The Kospi halt talk is part of the same unwind story.
BSo is it the election or the unwind? I'll say unwind.
AAnd I'll say the election was the catalyst. Either way, it was a rough one.
BRough, historic, whatever. It shows what happens when everyone's levered the same way.