Progressive Christian candidates had notable 2026 wins — Texas's James Talarico and Kansas's Adam Hamilton helped Democrats take the Senate — part of a surge of religious-left candidates.
Polls and ballot results show bipartisan opposition to data centers/AI buildout, and Texas has elected Democrat Gina Hinojosa as governor. Texas is a leading data-center state, but whether she stalls growth is opinion, not established. This is commentary on Congress's oversight duty, not a factual claim to verify.
The 2026 midterms were a major Democratic win: Democrats flipped Congress, won the Texas governorship, and ended Mike Johnson's House majority. Calling it a “massive repudiation” is an interpretation but grounded in those results.
Conductor Herbert Blomstedt has died at 99, according to NPR.
Democrats flipped control of Congress; Chuck Schumer described it as a generational remake of the Senate and said Democrats must deliver.
House Speaker Mike Johnson will step aside as the top House Republican next Congress after Republicans lost the majority.
With Democrats back in the majority, they are planning a series of Trump-related investigations, including Epstein files, Elon Musk, the Iran war, and Trump business interests.
BAxios just posted on X about progressive religious leaders changing America's political landscape.
BThat's the under-covered piece. Axios points to a Kansas pastor, Adam Hamilton, who helped Democrats take the Senate.
BThe religious left isn't new, but it never had this much ballot power.
BIt's a reminder the Democratic coalition is not just urban and secular.
BBut I wonder if that lasts. Progressive religious voters want abortion rights and LGBTQ protections.
BThey just did in Kansas. That's not a theory, that's a result.
BFair. But the party has to keep them. They tend to flip when culture wars heat up.
BOr maybe they're the ones forcing the party to talk differently.
BThat's a genuine story tonight, not a side note.
BIt might be the reason the Senate flipped. That's bigger than any single hearing.
BThat flip hands Democrats oversight power. George Conway just posted on X the cleanest version of that fight.
BHe says it's not getting even. It's a duty.
BCongress has oversight power. A House majority just changed hands. Democrats now hold the gavels.
BAnd the discipline not to turn it into revenge TV? That's the whole question.
BThe executive branch answers to Congress. That's not revenge, that's the Constitution.
BOf course it is. But voters also said they want affordability. If every hearing is a show trial, they lose the room.
BCome on, oversight IS accountability. You can't deliver affordability if agencies stonewall Congress.
BI'm not against oversight. I'm against pretending the last two years of investigations never happened.
BWhat's that supposed to mean?
BThe same people who spent years on Hunter Biden now want clean, high-minded hearings? Give me a break.
BOh, so because one side did it badly, this side gets a pass?
BNo. The standard should be higher. Not no oversight—better oversight.
BAnd you trust a freshly flipped House to be the grown-ups?
BI trust the voters to punish them if they're not. That's what just happened to Republicans.
BThat's exactly my point. Voters punished failure to govern, not oversight.
BThey punished chaos, too. Investigation season can turn into chaos fast.
BConway's right: it's a duty. The question is whether they do it like surgeons or butchers.
BAnd we'll know by March. First hearing, first leak.
BRight around the time the honeymoon ends.
BDifferent kind of honeymoon problem: Texas just got a Democratic governor. Daniel Newman on X says data centers and AI weren't popular with a big chunk of both parties.
BTexas elected a Democratic governor. That changes the math.
BGina Hinojosa pulled it off. Now every business in Texas is trying to read her.
BHere's the thing: data centers are the growth engine in that state. You don't show up and kill the golden goose.
BNo one's talking about killing it. She's talking about making it pay for the power and water it burns.
BThat's how it starts. A fee here, a moratorium there, and projects go to Oklahoma.
BOh, come on. Texas has cheap energy and no state income tax. A few guardrails won't chase anyone out.
BTell that to the Texas counties some say voted against new data center projects. The backlash looks bipartisan.
BExactly. That's why she can push reasonable rules and keep the boom going. Voters want balance, not a shutdown.
BYou're asking a Texas Democrat to be pro-growth in a state that just punished Republicans for not governing. That's a lot of faith.
BShe didn't win on shutting down data centers. She won on schools, prices, and infrastructure. She knows what happens if the lights get more expensive.
BSo she'll let them build, but she'll make them pay? That's a very Washington answer.
BIt's called having a governor who can do two things at once.
BWe'll see. Texas's economy runs on energy, literally—a Democratic governor has to prove she won't turn off the tap.
BProducers have to prove they won't leave the rest of Texas holding the bill. That's the actual argument.
BI'll give you this: if she threads that needle, she's president in a decade.
BLet's not get ahead of ourselves. First, she has to survive a data center hearing.