As of just after Tuesday's midterms, Republicans still held the White House, Senate, House and a conservative Supreme Court majority. The Democratic wave may shift control of at least one chamber when the new Congress is seated, but “voting Red or Blue cannot save them” is political opinion, not a factual claim. [cnbc.com] [bbc.co.uk]
The BBC reported that Tuesday's midterms produced a Democratic wave, which some Canada watchers see as helpful for tariff relief and as pressure on the White House. [bbc.co.uk]
Ukrainian officials say a Russian double-tap strike on a village killed at least 40 people and that another 30 may still be under rubble; the BBC is reporting Kyiv's claims, not independently confirming the full toll. [bbc.co.uk]
Iran's chief negotiator Mohammed Bagher Ghalibaf said the American midterm vote was a “no to war,” and Donald Trump acknowledged the conflict's role in the Republican defeat; the BBC reported those statements. [bbc.co.uk]
FC Andorra goalkeeper Jesús Owono issued a club statement expressing sorrow after Tenerife forward Jesús de Miguel's death; the BBC reported the statement. [bbc.co.uk]
BRene Reyna on X posted that the Fed's rate-setting committee and CNBC are funneling dark money to politicians.
BHe ended it with "Ding dong common sense is dead."
BDid he offer a single email, a leaked memo, a donor list? No—just a balance sheet and lobbyist vibes.
BHe throws around the Fed balance sheet, trillions in federal spending, the White House, Congress, the Supreme Court. It's a villain collage.
BThe Fed is an independent government agency. Its profits go to the Treasury, not to politicians.
BBut the balance sheet is roughly six and a half trillion dollars. That size does make people suspicious.
BSuspicion is fine. The claim that CNBC reporters are lobbyists for the Fed is just invented.
BYou're defending the Fed, but there is a revolving door between finance and government. That part is real.
BRevolving door is real. Dark money from the FOMC is not. This post merged two separate problems into one cartoon villain.
BBut that's exactly why it spreads! People hear "independent central bank" and think "unaccountable."
BNo, wait— that's not what "unaccountable" means. The Fed has a chair who testifies before Congress.
BYeah, he testifies, and then does what he wants. That's not accountability to the person paying more for groceries.
BThe Fed is accountable to its mandate, not to grocery prices. And its decisions are public. This post isn't about any of that.
BIt's about the fact that no one goes to jail for 2008, and that feeling becomes conspiracy.
BThat I understand. But this post names the FOMC and CNBC as the bagmen. That's false, and we say it's false.
BFine. The post is false. But the anger about money in politics isn't going anywhere.
BIt shouldn't. That's a real fight. It just isn't fought at the Fed.
BSpeaking of losing faith in the system, a Libertarian Party account in New Brunswick posted on X: "Four boxes of liberty."
BThat's the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box.
BTheir take: Americans have realized the first two won't save them, and the fourth is too scary, so they keep trying the third.
BAnd the third is juries. Juries don't overturn elections, Brian.
BBut that's the point! Both parties keep expanding spending, keep the wars going, keep the surveillance state. What does your vote actually change?
BIt changes who holds the gavel. That changes judges, investigations, tariffs. That's not nothing.
BIt changes the managers, not the machine. The post says the Red Team controls every branch, and people still feel stuck.
BThey control it right now. But the post ignores that voters can hand the House to the other party next session.
BYou think that'll end the frustration? The underlying policies won't shift much.
BI think your vote is a check, not a savior. That's a big difference.
BBut that's exactly my point—the post is saying voting Red or Blue cannot save you. They're right that no party is coming to rescue anyone.
BAnd then what? The fourth box is ammunition. That's not a political argument, Brian. That's a threat.
BThey're not telling people to use it. They're saying that's the last resort people are afraid to even talk about.
BTalking about armed resistance after a midterm wave is not sober politics. It's performance.
BOh, come on—so any mention of the cartridge box is off-limits? The whole quote is about liberty, not a call to arms.
BIt's a framing that treats losing an election as a failure of liberty. That's dangerous.
BYou're reading it in the worst possible light. The post says the first two boxes haven't saved Americans. That's a legitimate critique.
BMaybe legitimate in a country where voting doesn't work. But we just saw a wave that might shift control. Voting did something.
BFine. Voting gives a check. But the frustration is real.
BThe frustration is real, and so is the line between checks and cartridge boxes. We can say both.