Binance reported a $6.34 billion theft, among the largest crypto exchange heists ever. The attackers used social engineering: they approached an engineer with a fake job interview and a malicious download, then used that foothold to move funds out.
The techniques match well-known North Korean state-sponsored cyber operations, particularly the Lazarus Group, which has targeted crypto firms to generate revenue for the regime and circumvent sanctions. Wired notes the methods were “well-known tricks,” but they still worked.
Apple's Eye Tracking is real and available as an iOS 18/iPadOS 18 accessibility feature, and Vision Pro uses eye tracking as a primary input method. Musk's Blastar origin story is also documented: he wrote it at age 12 in 1984 and sold it for about $500. This is a product listing/ad for Anker power banks with specs and a price in Nigerian naira; no news claim to verify. Hypothetical engagement bait; no factual claim.
In 2012, Samsung's Galaxy S III overtook Apple's iPhone 4S as the best-selling smartphone in the US for at least one quarter.
Wired reports that the Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5x is currently on sale for $900.
T-Mobile, AT&T, and Verizon are advertising up to $1,200 off Apple's iPhone Duo, but the deals require a 36-month carrier plan and may cost more over time. This is a Wired headline describing online conspiracy-theorist chatter about voter fraud; no single factual claim to verify.
Binance says suspected North Korean hackers stole $6.34 billion by tricking an engineer with a fake job interview and a malicious download to gain access to its systems.
MSix point three four billion dollars. Binance says that's how much walked out of its systems in one heist.
CSix point three four billion? One heist?
MOne of the largest crypto exchange thefts ever, according to Wired.
CHow did they even get in? Don't tell me it was a password reset.
MWorse. A fake job interview for an engineer, then a malicious download.
CA fake job interview. In twenty twenty-six.
MBinance says suspected North Korean hackers did it. Wired calls the methods well-known tricks.
CHow does a company holding billions fall for a fake recruiter? That's the part I can't shake.
MThat's exactly the argument. The technical exploit wasn't new. The human layer opened the door.
CNo, no—wait. Social engineering works because it targets people, not code. You can't patch a person.
MBut billions of dollars should mean multiple humans checking every big transfer.
CYou think one engineer clicked a file and money flew out? These operations take months. They map the system, wait, then move fast.
MI'm not saying it was instant. I'm saying Binance's controls should have caught the movement.
CThey likely had internal access that looked legitimate. That's the whole point of a foothold.
MThen why weren't withdrawal limits or multi-signature reviews stopping it?
CMulti-sig only helps if the keys aren't already compromised. Once they're inside, it's game over.
MThat's a cop-out. Six billion dollars doesn't just leave without someone noticing.
CThey probably did notice! But by then, the funds reportedly moved through mixers and bridges. That's the Lazarus playbook.
MChainalysis has warned for years that North Korea-linked groups are behind many large exchange hacks.
CExactly. That's why I put more blame on Pyongyang than on one engineer.
MBut Binance is the last line of defense. If a fake interview defeats it, what's the point?
CThe point is they can freeze some funds and help track the rest. It's not zero.
MSix billion is a pretty big not-zero.
CYou keep coming back to the number. I get it. It's huge. But blaming the victim is not a security strategy.
MI'm not blaming the victim. I'm asking what customers are supposed to trust.
CThey can trust that exchanges are improving, but this was a state actor. That's different from a lone hacker.
MState actor or not, the money's gone. That's the part that matters to regular users.
CIt matters. But the bigger story is how North Korea is alleged to fund its regime through crypto. That's a national security problem.
MThen maybe exchanges need the same security standards as banks.
CBanks get hacked too. The difference is depositors are insured.
MNow that's a real point. Crypto doesn't have that backstop.
CRight. And being your own bank means being your own security. Most people can't do that.
CDifferent world entirely. Someone on X wants to bring back Blastar, the game Elon Musk reportedly wrote in nineteen eighty-four.
MThe space shooter he reportedly sold for five hundred dollars at age twelve?
CRoger Douglas Ware says Apple's eye tracking could make a modern hands-free version.
MThat's actually a fun idea. Apple put eye tracking in iOS eighteen as an accessibility feature, and Vision Pro uses it as a main input.
CRight. You could aim with your gaze. No controller, no tap.
MBut the original Blastar wasn't exactly a deep game. This is a niche novelty.
CNovelty plus old-school space shooting? I'd play it once. Maybe twice.
MThe problem is, for most people eye tracking is still an accessibility tool, not a game controller.
CSome indie developer will build it anyway. That's how these things start.
MMaybe. But I wouldn't start a company on it.
CNo one's asking you to.
MMeanwhile, Wired is reporting that election fraud claims are spreading online, despite what it calls a lack of apparent evidence.
COn election day, every platform gets flooded. The question is what's actually verifiable.
MThe piece says influencers, watchdogs, and some pundits are convinced fraud is everywhere today. But no evidence.
COkay, but "no apparent evidence" doesn't mean every claim is automatically false. It means people need to show receipts.
MThat's fair. But if you're broadcasting fraud before votes are counted, you're not reporting, you're amplifying.
CI don't disagree. I'd just add the media's been wrong enough that some skepticism runs both ways.
MSo the real story is that everyone on the internet is confident and nobody waits for data.
CThat's every election. Technology made it louder.