ACarl Quintanilla posted a note on Bluesky from RBAdvisers, and it takes a shot at the Fed.
BThat's the kind of line that gets a bond trader's attention. What's the argument?
ATheir words: 'it less than 24 hours for the Fed to look unwise for not raising rates.' Core PCE is moving away from 2 percent.
BAway as in up. But one sticky print doesn't make them unwise.
AIt's not just one print. Excluding food and energy, the deflator has been drifting the wrong way. And they held.
BThey held because raising now would crack credit. That's a choice, not a mistake.
ANo, no—if inflation is accelerating, the real rate is falling. That's easier money without a vote.
BThe real rate point is strong. I'll give you that.
AThank you. So if the real rate is falling while they hold, policy is effectively easing.
BThat's not intentional. It's just math.
AExactly. And that math is the note's whole point.
BBut math doesn't tell you when to hike. If the labor market rolls over, you'll be glad they waited.
AIf inflation rolls up, you'll be glad they moved sooner.
BYou can't have both. That's the Fed's job.
ARight, and right now they're choosing only one tail risk. That's what the note is calling unwise.
BMaybe. I'd say they're choosing the tail risk that's easier to reverse. A rate hike is harder to undo.
AA rate hike is easy to undo—cut it back. Inflation is harder to undo once it embeds.
BFine. Direction's not good. Timing's still debatable.
AAnd the note's point is that the Fed's own favorite gauge is going the wrong way. You can't spin that.
BI'm not spinning it. I'm saying the response isn't automatic.
ANo one said automatic. But if you're not even leaning against it, you're not fighting it.
BAlright, that's fair. The response has been slow, and I'll grant that.
AWhich is why the note has teeth.
BIt has teeth because it's true about direction, not because raising now is wise.
AGood enough. We'll see the next core PCE.
ASticking with rates and tech, CoinGecko posted on X that Amazon fell 8.4 percent and Intel dropped 16 percent after weaker than expected earnings.
BThose are circulating numbers, not confirmed closes. Big if true.
AThe post says Amazon's ad revenue missed by one point two billion dollars. Amazon Web Services still grew 39 percent.
BThat Amazon Web Services number is the real story. If it's real, cloud isn't the problem.
AThe miss was ads and maybe the Q3 bottom line. Intel beat on earnings per share but guided weak? The post cuts off.
BWhen the post cuts off, the market's already moving on it.
AWe'll wait for official numbers. But that's the kind of tape that makes a closing bell ugly.
BUgly for tech, maybe. The Fed story and this both point to higher-for-longer and a rotation out of what worked.
AThat's the tension: rates up, growth names down. That's today.
ASeparate from markets, one watched account on X is pointing to Sky News reporting that Putin says Russia is prepared for war, but does not want war.
BThat's unconfirmed. Sky News is the source, but no independent verification yet.
AIf it's real, it's a familiar line: prepared, but doesn't want it. Markets hear it as more uncertainty.
BThat's the kind of headline that keeps oil bid and equities nervous into the close.
AWe'll keep an eye on it. For now, it stays unverified until someone else confirms it.
AAnd on Bluesky, a cat owner turned dinner into a cross-examination.
BGo on.
AThe post imagines a prosecutor asking the cat, Jinx, if he's ever been fed. The cat says, 'I have never been fed. Not once. Today I had to make my own shrimp.'
BThe cat made shrimp? That's more than I cooked today.
AThe caption says returning after midnight requires compensatory snacks.
BI'm not saying the cat is right, but I understand the energy.
ASame.