Weil, Gotshal & Manges, one of Wall Street's most prominent law firms, has recommended an orderly wind-down. The firm has about 1,200 lawyers across 16 offices in the US, Europe and Asia, and reported more than $2 billion in revenue last year. Partners are expected to vote in the coming days.
The collapse followed a wave of high-level partner departures, failed merger talks with Willkie Farr & Gallagher, and the collapse of a succession plan when private equity partner Ramona Nee backed away from succeeding longtime leader Barry Wolf. Broader market shifts also hurt Weil: corporate restructuring has moved away from traditional Chapter 11 bankruptcy cases toward out-of-court liability-management deals championed by rivals like Kirkland & Ellis and Latham & Watkins.
Weil, Gotshal & Manges' management committee has recommended an orderly wind-down, with partners expected to vote in the coming days; the firm has about 1,200 lawyers and reported more than $2 billion in revenue last year.
Trump's record $1.5 trillion defense budget request is stalling in Congress; frustration over Iran and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has stymied the president's agenda, though a deal is still possible. This is a rhetorical political argument, not a factual claim that can be checked. Same rhetorical post as above; no checkable factual claim. This is political commentary and opinion, including hyperbole about “record high inflation”; not a straightforward factual claim worth verifying.
There are not 100 million or 50 million illegal immigrants in the US; DHS estimates put the unauthorized immigrant population around 11 million as of 2022, and Mexicans are not close to 50 million.
BWeil Gotshal? The bankruptcy firm?
BOne of Wall Street's biggest. Twelve hundred lawyers, two billion dollars in revenue last year — and the management committee just recommended an orderly wind-down. Partners vote in the coming days.
BThat's a massive institution just... dissolving. What happened?
BA cascade. High-level partners leaving, a failed merger with Willkie Farr, and a succession plan that fell apart when the heir apparent backed away. But the bigger story — the bankruptcy business itself moved.
BRestructuring left traditional Chapter 11 filings for these out-of-court liability deals. Rivals like Kirkland and Latham ate their lunch.
BSo it's not a scandal. It's a market shift that caught a giant flat-footed.
BA firm that made its name on other people's failures just had its own. There's something almost Shakespearean about it.
BI don't know that it's Shakespearean. Twelve hundred lawyers will find jobs. This isn't Lehman. But it is a warning — you can be the best at something and still lose if the market moves.
BFair. Gibson Dunn's Scott Greenberg said Weil 'made this a respectable practice that every law firm wanted to have.' That's a real legacy. And associates are getting up to ninety days of pay during the wind-down.
BSo the people at the bottom are protected, at least for now. The partners will scatter. Some will land at Kirkland, Latham — the firms that beat them.
BAnd that's the part that gets me. This isn't some fly-by-night shop. Weil handled General Motors, Enron, Lehman. Two billion in revenue. If they can't survive, what does that say about the whole sector?
BIt says the sector adapted and they didn't. That's not a systemic failure. That's competition.
BAlright, competition's fair. But when a hundred-and-thirty-year-old firm disappears, something's lost. Institutional memory. The people who've done every kind of restructuring since the eighties.
BAnd those people will keep doing it somewhere else. That's how markets work. I'm with you on the sadness, not the doom.
BFine. Speaking of institutions under pressure — you've got one from Washington.
BTrump's record defense budget — one and a half trillion dollars — is stalling in his own Congress.
BHis own party's balking? On defense?
BThe Washington Post says frustration over Iran and over Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has stymied the whole thing. A deal's still possible, but it's stuck.
BSo the president asked for the biggest military budget in history, and his own side won't pass it. That's not governance, that's paralysis. What's the actual objection?
BThat's the question nobody's answering clearly. Is it Hegseth? Is it Iran strategy? Or is it just that a trillion and a half needs an actual plan, not a number?
BNo, wait — the plan is deterrence. Iran's been a threat for years. You can't negotiate with Tehran from a position of weakness. The money IS the strategy.
BThat's not a strategy, Brian. That's a budget line. Where's the force structure? Where's the doctrine? Until that's clear, holding the purse strings is Congress doing its job.
BOh, come on. They're not holding for strategy. They're holding because Hegseth annoys them. That's petty politics dressed up as oversight.
BOr it's oversight dressed up as petty politics. Either way, the president owns this. He picked Hegseth. He set the number. When your own party stalls your signature bill, that's on you.
BOkay, he owns the personnel choice. But a record defense budget dying in a Republican Congress — that's a story nobody saw coming six months ago.
BAnd yet here we are. Different corner of the fight: a post on X asks a simple question. If Democrats cheat in every election, why do Republicans hold the House, the Senate, the White House, and a six-three Supreme Court?
BI've seen that one. It's a decent rhetorical trap. If they cheat everywhere, how'd they lose everything?
BAnd if they only cheat in some elections, how do they choose? The post never gets an answer. It lands because it exposes how sloppy the 'cheating' argument has gotten.
BThe claim isn't 'Democrats cheat everywhere.' It's 'Democrats cheat where they can.' Big cities, swing states. That's the actual position.
BAnd how do they choose? That's the question. There's never an answer because there isn't one. It's a feeling, not an argument.
BAlright, I'll give you that. You ask for specifics, you get vibes.
BAnd speaking of vibes over facts — one post on X claims there are a hundred million illegal immigrants in the US, fifty million of them Mexican.
BThat's not a vibe, that's a fever dream.
BIt's false. DHS and Pew put the unauthorized population around eleven million. Mexican nationals, nowhere near fifty million. Immigration's a real issue — it doesn't need made-up numbers.
BExactly. Inflating it by a factor of nine doesn't help anything. It just gives the other side an easy punch.
BReal fights, real institutions, and then people just making up numbers to win arguments. That's Thursday afternoon in Washington.