· Fact-checked before it aired. Unconfirmed claims from this segment are not shown.
Tyler Robinson, 23, is charged with aggravated murder and six other counts for fatally shooting conservative activist Charlie Kirk at a Turning Point USA rally at Utah Valley University on September 10, 2025. He faces a possible death sentence. At a status conference on October 23, 2026, a trial date could be set. Robinson's defense says it doesn't anticipate trial until the third quarter of 2029, estimating a six-to-seven-month trial, citing extensive evidence review and jury selection challenges. Prosecutors propose a January 31, 2028 start and estimate a 17-week trial.
The case is a capital case with a "mountain of evidence," per prosecutors, and the defense argues it needs years to review aggravating and mitigating evidence, file pretrial motions, and seat a jury in a high-profile case. Charlie Kirk's widow, Erika Kirk, has invoked her right to a speedy trial under Utah law, and her attorney, Jeffrey Neiman, called the defense's proposed timeline "grossly out of line," urging the judge to set a trial date.
Erika Kirk, Charlie Kirk's widow, has invoked her right to a speedy trial under Utah law and her attorney called the defense's proposed 2029 timeline "grossly out of line," urging the judge to set a trial date sooner. The defense has said it doesn't anticipate trial until the third quarter of 2029. This is the AP describing its own reporting on early voters ahead of the 2026 midterms; no independently checkable factual assertion is made in the post itself.
Rep. Thomas Massie did make remarks to this effect, criticizing fellow Republicans for claiming election fraud while controlling the House, Senate, Supreme Court and White House. The quote has circulated widely and is consistent with Massie's public statements.
Same Massie quote as above; the attribution is accurate. This is an opinion/suggestion about withholding federal funds from states that withdraw from federal safe voting citizenship tools. It is a policy proposal, not a checkable factual claim.
S
Fact-check
VERIFIED TRUE
Erika Kirk, Charlie Kirk's widow, has invoked her right to a speedy trial under Utah law and her attorney called the defense's proposed 2029 timeline "grossly out of line," urging the judge to set a trial date sooner. The defense has said it doesn't anticipate trial until the third quarter of 2029. This is the AP describing its own reporting on early voters ahead of the 2026 midterms; no independently checkable factual assertion is made in the post itself.
Erika Kirk is pushing back against an effort to delay her late husband Charlie Kirk's murder trial until 2029. In new court filings, her legal team calls the defense's proposed timeline "grossly out of line" with comparable cases and urges the judge to schedule the trial for http
Rep. Thomas Massie did make remarks to this effect, criticizing fellow Republicans for claiming election fraud while controlling the House, Senate, Supreme Court and White House. The quote has circulated widely and is consistent with Massie's public statements.
Massie: "I think it's ironic that we control the House, the Senate, the Supreme Court, and the White House, yet we're screaming 'election fraud'? I mean, we won every damn election."
Same Massie quote as above; the attribution is accurate. This is an opinion/suggestion about withholding federal funds from states that withdraw from federal safe voting citizenship tools. It is a policy proposal, not a checkable factual claim.
🚨 BREAKING: Massie: "I think it's ironic that we control the House, the Senate, the Supreme Court, and the White House, yet we're screaming 'election fraud'? I mean, we won every damn election." https://t.co/Nrf9wq4ETT
Same Massie quote as above; the attribution is accurate. This is an opinion/hyperbolic statement about Elon Musk's influence, not a checkable factual claim.
BREAKING: Massie: "I think it's ironic that we control the House, the Senate, the Supreme Court, and the White House, yet we're screaming 'election fraud'? I mean, we won every damn election." https://t.co/Rvco0YQzrD
BZelenskyy reportedly said something that's going to raise eyebrows.
BThe quote going around: he believes even the Russians need Ukraine to join NATO, because it would give them greater security than Ukraine staying out.
BThat's... a take. I can't verify the exact quote, but if he said it, it's a fascinating argument.
BThe logic being: a Ukraine inside NATO is a Ukraine that can't be invaded without triggering Article 5. So Russia actually gets predictability.
BI don't think Moscow sees it that way. They've spent decades treating NATO expansion as an existential threat.
BRight, but Zelenskyy's point is about stability. A Ukraine outside NATO is a Ukraine Russia keeps trying to destabilize. Inside NATO, the border is fixed.
BIt's a clever reframe. But I doubt it moves anyone in the Kremlin. They didn't invade because they wanted a stable border.
BNo, they invaded because they thought they could win. That calculus doesn't change with a NATO membership debate.
BStill, it's a notable shift in rhetoric. Zelenskyy's been pushing NATO membership for years, but framing it as good for Russia is new.
BAnd that's the show tonight. A Zelenskyy quote that's going to get people talking, and a reminder to check the source before you share it.