A federal appeals court recently allowed Florida to enforce a 2024 law that bans social media accounts for children under 14 and requires parental consent for 14- and 15-year-olds. It is not a new move this week, and the law targets social media platforms with algorithms and addictive features, not “AI features” specifically.
Getty Images Holdings, Inc. filed voluntary Chapter 11 petitions in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware on October 21, 2026, as part of a prepackaged restructuring.
Getty Images filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on October 21, 2026, to implement a restructuring that will take the company private after its planned merger with Shutterstock collapsed amid heavy debt and AI-generated imagery competition.
Getty Images filed for Chapter 11 as part of a prepackaged plan to go private, following the failed Shutterstock merger and pressure from debt and AI-generated imagery.
Getty Images formalized its restructuring by filing for Chapter 11 on Wednesday, October 21, 2026, and plans to go private after the Shutterstock merger collapsed. This is an opinion/commentary, not a checkable factual claim. This is a joke/personal quip, not a checkable factual claim. This is political commentary and hashtags, not a checkable factual claim.
APolymarket just posted that Florida is moving to restrict social media and AI features for teens.
BThat's not new. A federal appeals court let Florida enforce its 2024 law.
ARight. The law bans social media accounts for kids under 14 and requires parental consent for 14- and 15-year-olds.
BAnd it's about algorithms and addictive features, not 'AI features' specifically. Polymarket's framing is off.
AA prediction market being loose with the details. Shocking.
BThe real fight is whether states can just decide who gets to be online.
AAnd that's a genuine argument. Parents want control. Platforms want users. Kids are in the middle.
BI think the law is overreach. A 13-year-old can read the news on a social app, but Florida says no.
ABut the addictive design is real. Infinite scroll is built to keep kids hooked.
BSo teach them. Don't ban them. You don't fix a bad habit by making the habit illegal.
AThe courts are letting it stand for now. That's the part that matters.
BAnd it'll go higher. This is nowhere near settled.
AMeanwhile on Bluesky, Tressie McMillan Cottom posted something that's been rattling around my head.
BWhat'd she say?
A'The scam economy is consuming the political will to fight authoritarianism.'
BThat's a heavy line. And she's not wrong about the scam part.
AShe's pointing at something real. When people are drowning in junk fees, fake deals, and pump-and-dump invites, they stop trusting anything.
BAnd when you stop trusting everything, you stop fighting for anything. That's the connection.
AIt's an opinion, not a fact-checkable claim. But it lands.
BI'd push back a little. People aren't apathetic. They're exhausted. There's a difference.
AExhaustion and apathy look the same from the outside.
BNo, they don't. Exhausted people still show up. Apathetic people stay home. The scam economy makes people tired, not indifferent.
AMaybe. But tired people make easier targets for whoever promises to clean it up.
BThat's... actually the scariest part of her post.
AAnd one more from Bluesky, because it's too good to skip. Idle-Ghosted posted: 'gaining five hundred pounds in a day? in this economy?!'
BThat's the whole post. Just that.
AIt's a joke about how even absurd things now have to answer to the economy.
BInflation's so bad, even weight gain is a luxury.
AIt's silly, but it's the same mood as Tressie's post. Everything feels like a transaction now.
BEven the jokes are about prices. That's when you know it's bad.
AAnd that's the show tonight. Florida's teen social media law, and a Bluesky post that sums up the mood.
BPlus a five-hundred-pound joke. We cover the full range.